Thursday, February 23, 2006

'Sup Port?

First thing- Just to state the obvious, we should never outsource our own National Security. We have Domestic Security Companies that could do the work just fine. Now people are up in arms calling "Racism" on anyone who questions the White House approval of an Arab Company's Security. It is not racism. It would not matter if the Company was Arab, Israeli, European , or Martian, there is no good reason to hire foreign security.

And now to the other support.

Support Our Troops

Check out the latest video I made. If you like it, please share it with anyone you know. If you don't like it, I am sure the line starts at the comments button.


Pete Bogs said...

one of the ports they're talking about us here in Tampa... I drive through that area every morning... after 9/11 they increased the distance between the roads and the giant fuel tanks... now they hand it all over to someone else... wtf?

Reverend X said...

Tampa? OK maybe there is one good reason. I hate Florida.
Just kidding.

Anonymous said...

Hellooooo, jus' Ole Aunty Belle passin' by...trying to learn who is who in this neighborhood of Bawgs and Contessa Vanilla.

Howdy-Do Reverend. Pleased to make your acquaintance. May I join you fer a spell? Ever met an ole' lady that *didn't* have somethin' to say on everything??? Cain't stan' those old bats myself, but when it is me, why, naturally its enlightening!

It is most distressin' to have our ports crawling with AAArabs. (Never mind that I got a spot of Arab myself, though I don't go a blabbing that around town, you know. Not the Moorish Arab sort, we are Maronite)

Preacher, this is the deal: It ain't *security* that the Emirates will be doin', it is management of loading and unloading ships and container transfers. Cuzzin' Jimmy Bob is in the the NAvy and he ASSURED me that the US Coast Guard and Homeland Security still manage the SECURITY aspect of the ports. NOT that that is any comfort on the matter at hand, the Emirates running the managment of the containers and all.

I certainly agree with you, a Man of the Cloth, that it is not about racism. I mean, I would like to see every Arab looking person in the airports go through pat-down. it is a matter of reason, not racism.

Well, now. I've dropped in my two cents, so I'll jes' be running along.

Thank you sir for lettin' a lady set a spell.

Aunty Belle

Anonymous said...

when will we realise supporting the troops means ending this fucked up war.

Ps have you visited shoutwire yet, lots of people on eithe side but very few seem to have any backup. although most of it seems to be everybody throwing each others argument back at the other EX republicans are stupid :NO liberals are stupid. no you are close minded : no, you are closeminded for beliveing the conspiracy theroists ect ect... mabye its not your style but there are plenty who could use a good dose of fact or at least someone who can argue with them past the point most rational people give up

Reverend X said...

Aunty Belle,
Thank you for settin' a spell with me. I was wondering if you were going to visit this far out on the wrong side of the tracks.
My only worry with the UAE is, "If you blame someone for something long enough, they tend to earn the guilt out of spite."
Arabs had nothing to do with 9-11. It's called a false flag op. Here is the news from London on 7-7, just after the bombings. It's a great example of how a false flag works.
When Drills Kill

Phiser consultants staged a fake terrorist strike that just happened to match the real terrorist strike that day... down to the bomb placement exactly. So if you put a fake bomb in a backpack and it explodes, what is the proper course of action? This guy tells you what to do! laugh

Yeah, I went by. Have not had time to get into the fray, but I did see what you meant about technique. Perhaps I am needed... Have you noticed Hellpig's improvement?

Anonymous said...

righteouschops, on 2/23/2006 4:29:02 PM
Total Posts: 145, Joined: 1/20/2006

In no particular order:

There are pictures of the terrorists passing through security at the airports.

Halliburton, ahhh Halliburton. When all else fails, blame Halliburton. Did you know the family of Lady Bird Johnson is the principal shareholder of Halliburton? Can you name 3 top competitors of Halliburton? Did you know that Halliburton has nearly twice as many employees as its closest competitor? They are regarded as the best in their field. And there aren't many competitors either. Clinton gave no bid contracts to Halliburton as well. Don't remember any complaints about that. If you were building something and you used to work for a construction company and knew that company inside and out, knew it was the #1 construction company and knew the strengths and weaknesses of it's competitors, wouldn't you be in a pretty good position to decide who gets the job? Cheney quit Halliburton in 2000 so are you implying that he got rich because they do? Halliburton was guaranteed only a 1 percent profit plus performance bonuses of 2-3 percent. Ooooo an embarrassment of riches, eh?

30,000-100,000 dead iraqis? Could you give me a more vague number? I'll give you the beneft of the doubt and lets "say" that 100,000 Iraqis have been killed. Keep in mind that the US didn't kill all of them. Remember, the bad guys are killing people too! So far, we have found the mass graves of roughly 300,000 Iraqis that Saddam murdered. That's so far, could be more. Let's put the casualties in perspective. During WWII there were 1,840,000 civilians killed in Germany alone. Roughly 700,000 in Japan. While every human life is precious, I'd say wa are doing an outstanding job of keeping the casualties low compared to other wars. As for the WMD's, like I said before, it is hilarious to me that you guys find it so hard to believe that Saddam could have gotten rid of them during the year that we fucked around with the UN and Europe before going in. But somebody shows you a fuzzy picture of sunlight reflecting off the bottom of one of the planes crashing into the WTC and its "ZOMG!!! YOU GUYS THERES A FUCKING MISSLE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE PLANE11!!!! BUUUUUUSH DID IT!!!!111!!!" Nevermind how incredibly stupid the idea of a missle strapped to the bottom of a plane that is going to crash into the target anyways is, especially when, on top of that, you also think the building was "wired" to explode. But you also ignore Saddam's #2 air force general telling anyone who will listen about Saddam ordering civilian planes gutted and filled with the WMD's and then flown into Syria. Or reports that the russians helped ship some in trucks into Iran. Interesting considering all protesting Russia did about us going into Iraq. And all the protesting they are doing now about the idea of us going into Iran. Russia is not our friend folks. That's a little bonus info for ya. Oh and that "mysterious liquid" was called Sarin. There was enough in that one shell to kill as many people as those that died on 9/11. Yeah, real dangerous.

Ok NORAD. On 9/11 there were only 14 fighter jets on alert in the contiguous 48 states. No computer network or alarm automatically alerted NORAD of missing planes. It doesn't work that way. You guys act like they scramble planes everyday. Not true. In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999. NORAD pre-9/11 focused on the airspace around the US, not in it. Flights originating in the States were not seen as threats and NORAD wasn't prepared to track them. I'm not going to go through a timeline with you because all of the conspiracy theorys use different ones and I'm sure the official report isn't going to be good enough for you since it shows that NORAD didn't have enough time to get planes to the WTC. Which they didn't even know where to send them. Because the terrorists turned off the planes' transponders, the air traffic controllers had to search through 4500 identical radar blips, crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors in their search for the missing planes. F-15s are fast but if you can't tell the pilot where to point it...

WTC7 - Pretty simple. For one, it burned for like 7 hours. On top of that, Tower one collapsed raining debris down on the south face of it. The fire, a little dammage from the collapse coupled with a design flaw, down you go.

I'm actually a little pissed that I have taken this much time to type all this up seeing as how I'm sure none of this will satisfy any of you. It's funny that the rest of us are expected to believe everything that you guys come up with but anytime we try to refute your claims you have the convenience of stating that the media, the gov't, the gov't's experts, or anyone that doesn't agree with you, is lying or "in on the conspiracy." But I guess that's what keeps the conspiracy theories alive, they can challenge everyone else but they can't be challenged because everyone else is "in on it" or is "a slave" to those that are. I guess basically I can't "prove" anything and neither can you. It's all just "theories". You are telling me your side and I'm giving you answers that make sense to me. It's just up to each individual to decide for himself what make the most sense. The logic behind your theories doesn't makes sense to me. Mine doesn't make sense to you because you are starting out with the assumption that everyone is lying to you. Kind of hard to compete with that. Not to mention that it's hard to change your mind about something when you've already estableshed your beliefs. That goes for both sides. This is all kind of pointless actually because I'm sure I won't "convert" any conspiracy theorists. But keep in mind that the g'ovt aren't the only people in the world with agendas. You guys are fond of pointing out who had the most to gain from 9/11. Try asking yourselves who has the most to gain from 9/11 conspiracy theories.

this is one argument on shout wire i cant really fight due to my lack of knowlage on the subjects but im pretty sure alot of it is bs . could you help with some evidence against this.

Reverend X said...

Here ya go anon,
Washington post only has one photo of hijackers. It is Atta. They found the single photo after 9-11 when Marvin Bush's Co Stratec who did security at Dulles for American and United on 9-11 gave them the pic. The other 3 groups of hijackers were invisible apparently. Otherwise they would have produced them.

The WWII argument is retarded. It is a look at the little birdy defense. On the same logic, a man could kill 20 kids, and in court say, "John Wayne Gacy killed 52. So I'm kewl, right?" Pointing out worse crimes in no way excuses the lesser crimes.
The Iraqi mass graves are from the 1991 uprising. I covered it a bit ago. It has blame all around.
The year we were screwing with the UN? That was the year we said Saddam must disarm MF else. If he got rid of the WMDs then he disarmed. Why did we attack if he did what we asked of him??

Norad. We scrambled over a hundred planes in the year before 9-11. Check out David Ray Griffins Madison Lecture for relevant facts. Also, those 1,000s of blips on Radar? The radar computers have filters. Turn off every blip with a transponder signal and there would have only been the four hijacked planes returning a radar signal. It is a keystroke. That is the type of things Air traffic Controllers and Defense techs do.
WTC 7- He is lying if he says fire ands debri did it. There is plenty of video showing the extent of the fire, the lack of debri damge and of course the free fall velocity collapse which short of a massive singularity appearing within the earth at that moment, is impossible.
I am pissed this guy took more time to write a pack of speculation, lies and vague trivia than he did to actually look into any of the evidence surrounding 9-11.
Go to 911 Research and spend a couple hours reading their main evidence and the debunkings of the debunkers. Then go tear this guy a new one!

Hellpig said...

Anonymous said...
"when will we realise supporting the troops means ending this fucked up war."

Real American's know what the word support means,It's Liberal FUCK wads like yourself who are clueless about what our Soldiers desire from Americans back home

Thank you for the support that you give all of us, it is welcomed and dearly needed. Please keep us in your prayers and know that we are here for you, the American People. God Bless our President, the United States, and the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky!
Philip Chapman/SSgt/USAF, Paducah, Ky.

I would like to thank all the people throughout America, thank you for all your support, without you we wouldn't be able to make it through all of this. Just a quick THANK YOU AMERICA for supporting us, oh yeah GO WILDCATS!!!!!!
AM2(AW) Blaine K. Tolbert, Tucson, Ariz.

I just want to thank everyone back at home for supporting us every day. Your letters and care packages make a big difference for us. God Bless you, all troops and the United States of America. OOH-RAH!
R. Ordaz/Cpl/USMC, Houston

There are 1690 more just like it take a look

Patriots supporting soldiers

In law, treason is the crime of disloyalty to one's nation or state. A person who betrays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor. Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such a maneuver.

Sux said...

It's refreshing to see someone actually take the time and effort to write a long post with opposing views. I'm not going to debate any of the "theories" that are going into yours and Rev X's postings, for now. Just for argument's sake, try not to discredit the reader before they have made a decision on the findings you present. For instance:

"...seeing as how I'm sure none of this will satisfy any of you"


" are starting out with the assumption that everyone is lying to you."


"This is all kind of pointless actually because I'm sure I won't "convert" any conspiracy theorists."

Anon, anon, anon... There are some extremely intelligent and open-minded bloggers here. It's not productive to project a behavior upon them that is most likely untrue. If you want people to listen, don't offend them by insinuating that they won't. Sure, a lot of people are just fucking subborn.. don't waste your time with these people unless you're willing to break them down little by little with unbiased facts and information. Even still, that's a full time job! You can find a home here (I assume), but allow us debate with you before you say we won't.

Hellpig said...

After a little more research my previous post didn't express the US as a whole here's a more infomative link..

UNITED States of America

Reverend X said...

All well and good. My video is reminding people that the support should not end when they get back. They need support psychologically, physically, and financially. And that is not even taking into account the health problems they will experience from the DU. The first Gulf War had less than 1,000 US casualties. We currently have 518,000 vets on permanent disability due to radiological illnesses. That war lasted 2 months? We have guys on their third deployment in Iraq. They might not be coming back at all.
Multiple Malignancies

Hellpig said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hellpig said...

I agree 100%

for the record I was only responding to ANON

Reverend X said...

Yeah, I figured. But you did not expect me to stay out of it, did you?

Anonymous said...

to sux
the long post was not mine but a fellow by the name of rightiouschops
on shoutwire. he and i were having a comparitvly civilised argument concering 9/11. i posted the colum to ask for advice from rev x becasuse he knows more about the issues talked about. if you want to see more of that sort go to shoutwire and take a look at the comments on various political hedlines

Hellpig said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hellpig said...

Reverend X said...
Yeah, I figured. But you did not expect me to stay out of it, did you?

LMAO of course not

Sux said...

I'm getting lost amongst the vast postings of Anonymousesesses. So, with Anon #1's post of a posting from shoutwire involving.. another Pork/Hellpig chop.. Anon #2 and uhm... nevermind. Sorry for the longwind about etiquite.

I agree with Rev X. Let's get some identifiers at the top.. I use "Sux" and I don't have a blog. (apparently, because I suck.) But my Anon postings mingled in with other Anon postings just felt like some sort of horrilble 12-step accident. So I clicked "other" before posting and just put in my name... the end.

Anonymous said...

Hey there Rev and all you anons
This is AB Anon (Aunty Belle) wit sompin' to say 'bout conspiracies.

First REverend, that is mighty fine of you to let me stretch mah laigs on your doorstep--and of course I would get on over heah, as I been following dear BAWGS around, you, know.

But mercy maud, you doan believe half'n what you say on 9-11 do ya?

You know now, as a Poa-rk Rind magnate I know a thang or two 'bout
pig swill, and that 9-11 site and its ideas sure do qualify!

Listen honey, Aunty here is old enough to have had a good chuckle when in 1900 and 69 the US fired those men off to the moon--but ain't it predictable that some folks can "prove" that it was all filmed in hollywoood and there war'nt no moonwalkers before Michael Jacking.

Now I must to hasten to say that jes' because you got aholt of the *wrong* conspiracy theory that doan invalidate ALL conspiracy theories.

THey's a conspiracy alright, Reverend sir, it jes' not what most folks would dream--in fact they's a pile of em' all connected to the one idea...but we oughta start with the one most close to this topic--Iraq and the war there...yes they's plenty --oh plenty--of WMDs there..still, and most of 'em traipsed across borders, but that is window dressing for the masses....

No, whatcha wanna look at is a map.You'll find it with a keystroke. Now relax your mind and let go of any "facts" this blog, that blog, this party, that party, tells us about the Reasons For War. Hit ain't none ob them Reasons (well, a little bit, but tain't the substance of the strategy)

Now look again at the map--think about how the geopolitical (WHOOee looky me wit that big word!)weights of nations have changed in 25 unkink you mind...know how the garden hose always kinks in de same spot? Minds do too. Ain't good to have a garden hose fer a mind.

So unkink youself an jes' think on that map, think about natural resources and needs of this or that close by nation. Think about the game of RISK--ya'll ever play that?

Pretty soon a reality is gonna jes swim up at you as you look at that map, (jes' like it did for OGA 30 years ago) and you gonna be so HAPPY that Saddam was a degenerate and needed takin out with or without any WMD or defiance of UN resolutions.

You a daddy right? Little twin boys?
THis here is the truth, Rev. Them boys cain't live in no world where folks making the decisions make em according to what they *wish* the world would be:

"I'd like to teach the world to sing
In perfect harmony
I'd like to buy the world a Coke
And keep it company

I'd like to buy the world a home
And furnish it with love
Grow apple trees and honey bees
And snow white turtle doves."

Oh dahlin' it is such a sweet sweet thang...but it ain't the Real Thing of the world. Your boys gonna live in the world of that map there on your lap--and it aint't no
coke joke.

SO, 'member this, Billy and sidekick ALgore go over to ME and oh lawdy! they are so mad at Bush and the gobermint..but they's jes the "good cop" so Bush can be the "bad cop" cause I promise you fine man, hit doan matter whether its a donkey or and elephant sittin' in the chair --they's ALL a looking at that map every dang day..and you can jes' be givin' thanks for that.

Aunty Belle.

Anonymous said...

Hi all!
Christmas Day falls on December 25. It is preceded by Christmas Eve on December 24, and in some countries is followed by Boxing Day on December 26. Some Eastern Orthodox Churches celebrate Christmas on January 7, which corresponds to December 25 on the Julian calendar. December 25 as a birthdate for Jesus is merely traditional, and is not thought to be his actual date of birth.Bye

Anonymous said...

Happy new year !-!
o:))))) [url=][/url]