Friday, February 17, 2006

The Story so Far, with Flash

I have finally received enough requests to write this:
Due to the mixed nature of the class, this lesson will be taught in tri-form.
Form 1- I will tell you what happened.
Form 2- Will link to the same material presented in a better way by persons of superior credibility and way more attention to detail than I could ever exhibit.
Form 3- Flash presentations with basically the same material, but also with kewl graghics and music for those of us who want to learn, but not if it involves any effort on our parts.

It will look like this:
Topic/Form 2- Form 1 blah blah blah. Flash/Form 3
For the sake of expediency and laziness we will start with the 2000 Election. At the end of this I will post links to background sites and pre 2000 info sites.

2000-
George W. Bush- Although never having run a single company successfully or otherwise not into the ground, this guy runs for President. Explicit-Bush Flash 99%- Tame Flash

Elected- Appointed actually, Bush was not elected. He was appointed President by the Supreme Court on December 11, 2000. Most of the country did not notice, care, or have any premonition of just how historically infamous this decision was. The first comparisons to Hitler are born, prematurely and that argument dies. Grand Theft America

2001-
Secret Energy Task Force- Cheney gets together with some Oil Barons, a few Mid East Despots, and Satan sitting in for the anti-environmentalists and tree date-rapers. Together they draw up plans for the distribution of future conquered lands and a snazzy pipeline in Afghanistan that the Taliban refuse to allow. Special note here- Check out the Iraqi Oil Field PDFs. They ain't maps, they're proposals. That's thinking ahead... Market speculation bordering on prognostication. A few years later Congress inadvertently stumbles on some of this info while interviewing a few Oil Execs. Fortunately they don't have the Exec's swon in while testifying so there are no problems to fix after the Exec's blatantly lie about their involvement in the task force. Warning: Real images, really fucked up effects Unrelated but timely flash

9-11
What Happened- Nothing remotely similar to the 9-11 Commission report happened that day. Follow the first link here. They are by far the most thorough and credible of the 9-11 websites. Which of course, is saying a lot since technically I own a competitor site. They are better. Mine is Cooler. And the 9-11 Commission should have been called "All the President's Men". It is more accurate. Rise Flash

War on Terror- this is the 7th inning stretch. Take some time and look over a few points of interest before the last couple of innings. Peace Flash

Switch to Saddam- They just lied... Made up connections and ran with it. Lies Flash

Iraq- The oldest rule of War- No one can win a war against a population. Genocide is only effective in creating a smaller, more determined enemy. This War was lost on the day Bush declared Victory. The two events are merely coincidental. Flash Flash and more Flash


2004-

Re Elected- Since he was not elected the first time, should be no surprise here. Try the GAO
report. Actually, I have a pretty well vetted page on this. Where We Stand Flash

Epilogue-

Where is the Media- They are right where they are supposed to be. In '97 Clinton did away with the 7-7-7 law and the independent "free press" was gobbled up by a few giant corporations. TV Flash

Is there any hope? I damn well hope there is!

Or WTFWJD?

36 comments:

Hellpig said...

damn REV,I think you have to much time on your hands,seeing how he did get a second term isn't your point kinda mute,the libs have been trying for 5 1/2 years to impeach him,instead of doing thier jobs they were elected for they spend all thier time cooking up ways to discredit OUR President..anyhow nice job on this lengthy detailed post

Reverend X said...

Hellpig,
Since it seems I am not going to lose you any time soon, lets get some learn on for ya.
First- being the first to reply is not a worthy goal. If you reply within minutes of a posting, it's a giveaway you did not read, link check and or fact check the posting. Gives away a weakness if you will. He who replies first gains nothing. He who replies last has usually shut down the opposition.
Second- Get a google plug in for your browser. Comes with a White House resistant search box and a entry-field spellchecker. Use it.
Third- When in a conversation where you are ignorant of the topic, it is better to stay silent and appear the fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt. -Clemens
This means, you do not have to reply every time. Pick your fights. Go with your strengths and try to win. The reply above is a perfect example of what not to do. It barely makes sense and I am giving you liberal translations here.

"Kinda mute?" You mean "Moot" as in pointless, right? Kinda devoid of purpose... absolute concept in degrees. Not good.
"seeing how he did get a second term" is in fact a primary condition of my point. If he had not illegally retained said position, we would not be discussing the illegality of his retaining said position.
"doing thier(sic) jobs they were elected for" Wrong and horribly wrong. They were elected to represent their constituents and protect the Constitution from power hungry despots. They have not even lived up to your grammatically butchered accusation. Which is, ironically severe negligence on their part. Do not accuse someone of doing their job. It looks bad. Also the use of "cooking" is pathetic. Plotting, scheming, conspiring, just to name a few better choices.

OK, homework. Read the article in its entirety. Click the links and look for inconsistencies in corroboration and content. A common mistake of bloggers is to read only the paragraph they are interested in, miss the point of the document and link it anyways. Using their links to refute their points is friggin awesome.
Then, once you've done all that, write a better rebuttal.

Hellpig said...

OUCH!!

Hellpig said...

and no I meant MUTE as in falling on deft ears

and I like to fight them all sooner or later I have to win one

how is my grammer here

BLOW ME

Reverend X said...

"and no I meant MUTE as in falling on deft ears"
I'd assume since the ears are nimble as you stated, they can get out of the way of anything falling on them. Lesson two, look for similarly spelled words after spell checking. ROFLMAO!

"and I like to fight them all sooner or later I have to win one"

Sorry, but like a Powerball jackpot, winning is never guaranteed no matter how many times you play. As to The blow me bit...

Remember your first blow job?





What did it taste like?

rusty shakelford said...

I must be an @sshole too. I had to buy my way into college. Nice try with the drunk driving thing, too bad the picture doesnt match. You might as well showed the 100 car pile up from the Blues Brothers movie. Nice little piece of propaganda. It will do well with the young democrats who have the attention span of a gold fish

K9 said...

hallo ReverendX,

is funny to read here you mens locker room put downs! i am happy for you to have pig of hell and red america map to spar together.

i watch idiot son cinema. not selling me with only 3 chords played over and over! and call names make no point. and also, sing about man with better grade by point than gigolo of frumpy ketchup vrouw!

you cinema beter ReverendX.

i denk if you america election stole then you party would never give up fighting.

i see you give samurai points for battle to the hellpig. i look forward to next round.

i go to view more cinemaX now.

Hellpig said...

"being the first to reply is not a worthy goal"

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22428691&postID=113993307024946849

practice what you preach REV and as far as how did the blow job taste ask you DAD,he even swallowed and it only cost me a dollar

I still come to the same conclusion you talk and talk yet you say nothing

judging my spelling or trying to trash me isn't making your point it just makes you look ANAL,but then again you are a FLAMING LIB who takes everything out of context.

but if you actually read what I said in the first post you would see I actually complimented you but you were to fixated on trying to trash me.

I guess this proves my point

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER

Reverend X said...

Rusty,
" who have the attention span of a gold fish "
Says the guy who watched a flash then left.

Hellpig,
"judging my spelling or trying to trash me isn't making your point it just makes you look ANAL,but then again you are a FLAMING LIB who takes everything out of context."
I use the spell checker. That was a tip not a slap. I figured since you were going to be involved in the public discourse here, it was time to improve your technique. "Liberalism is a..." gets old after a while. Bring something meaningful to the debate.

Get off my Dad, I just got off yours!! lol


"anyhow nice job on this lengthy detailed post"
I mistook that for sarcasm. Now what was your point in regards to this post?

Reverend X said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hellpig said...

posted by Reverend X at 10:04 PM

Hellpig said... 1:27 AM

"If you reply within minutes of a posting, it's a giveaway you did not read, link check and or fact check the posting. Gives away a weakness if you will. He who replies first gains nothing."

again I stand vindicated

NEXT!!!

Hellpig said...

I FORGOT.....


let me start all over..LOL

I will get off for a while and let someone who actually wants to debate you on this.cya

Reverend X said...

Cya Helly,
Still unsure whether or not he had a point I failed to cover. Small point anyways. You'd figure with all the '2-3" gauranteed' spam he'd of... I apologize. I'll stop that now.
Anyone actually go to any of the links or did ya'll just grab the cliff notes?

K9 said...

ReverendX

it a full time job to follow links where you footnote you own cinema and friend. if a paper is wrote you cannot use you own self as verifyed truth. what will you write after bush is away? will the oter wit huis spy on you blog too?

K9 said...

ReverendX

(droevig, vergat ik dit)
also, wilkipedia anybody can schrijf anything they like on it. so....
the bush file dicht papers! no persons want to read what already been said.

again, i ask of you, if bush stolen wit huis, then oter side would never give up over it. is true right?

Pete Bogs said...

this shows true dedication, Rev... thanks for your efforts... sadly, some people will never belief the truth, even if it's staring them in the face...

Reverend X said...

Freya,
the cinema is only there for entertainment. The Information is in the primary links. Any place where I link to my own site is purely for convenience in showing multiple links. I don't think I reference myself anywhere, do I? If so, let me know. I will fix it immediately.

Reverend X said...

Freya,
what other side? In the past, totalitarian regimes fell when the status quo became unbearable. The masses knew who to blame. American know how fixed that glitch. One bipolar party with two diametrically opposed facades to split the blame and the masses. This dichotomy is a self perpetuating defensive blind spot.

K9 said...

i see what is cinema link for. you reference you to teach the form 3 of lazy. okay. i read the goa and judicial watch and newspapers to. the pipelines too, very much information. takes long time. oter side is democracy party. ik kijk vooruit you next joke funny reverendX.

Hellpig said...

Subject: What liberal Traitors Forget- Everything that came before Iraq War

Unless Bush had a fucking time machine.

Everything that came before Iraq War
Filed under: War on Muslim oil tick Terror

World Trade Center 1993

Khobar Towers 1996

Nairobi 1998

East Timor 1999

USS COLE - 2000

New York City 9/11/01

New York City 9/11/01

Washington, DC 9/11/01

Bali 2002

Let’s not forget the 1985 hijacking of the Achille Lauro, during which Abu Nidal murdered Leon Klinghoffer - before taking refuge in Iraq.

Let’s not forget the taking of American hostages, in 1979, held for 444 days.

Let’s not forget bin Laden’s own words in 2001 rallying against the West and trying to convince the world that our efforts in Afghanistan were unjust because, “there is no evidence of the involvement of the people of Afghanistan in what happened in America.” (H/T Glenn Reynolds) Rather like those insisting the same about Iraq, today.

Tell us some more how terrorists are only responding to regime change in Iraq, and how if only we would obey the “insurgents” there and leave Iraq, all of this would end. Tell us that some more, Tell us all about it you tired, phoney, so-called intellectuals and sophisticates.

Tell us how terror that has existed for decades is all the fault of George W. Bush and his poodles Tony Blair and John Howard!!?

Thank God for these men, who understand that giving in to Islamic terrorism today will not make us safer tomorrow.

ROFLMAO

NEXT!!

Reverend X said...

I covered most of those. 9-11-01, No credible evidence linking Bin Laden or any of the people in Afghanistan to the hijacking of any planes on that day. Seriously Hellpig, I enjoy a good fight, but go to http://911research.wtc7.net and see for yourself. That site has niether political bias nor any patience with bullshit speculation. It tears apart the official theory, the accepted conspiracy theories, Nist, Fema, Popular Mechanics, and just about everything else they can find a flaw in. But when everything is said and done, once the impossibles have been ruled out, what is left is reality. Go see for yourself.
I respect your passion. I am not the guy to convince you of anything. Hoffman might be.

Hellpig said...

"Second- Get a google plug in for your browser. Comes with a White House resistant search box and a entry-field spellchecker. Use it."

"niether" is misspelled.
Here are some suggestions:

neither
another
either
mother
niece
together
never
whether
next
nieces
better
father
rather
brother
entire


Damn I own you today REV

Reverend X said...

Hellpig,
What are you afraid of? Go look at the site.

Hellpig said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hellpig said...

You are making this too easy


911

Reverend X said...

Here is the info Fox did not pass along from Al Jazeera. Authentication-
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=10544

Hellpig said...

"He who replies last has usually shut down the opposition."

"Click the links and look for inconsistencies in corroboration and content. A common mistake of bloggers is to read only the paragraph they are interested in, miss the point of the document and link it anyways. Using their links to refute their points is friggin awesome."


TOTAL OWNAGE

I'm out CYA

Hellpig said...

your SHITTING ME

aljazeera

now your just grasping

Reverend X said...

Hellpig,
Your Foxnews article validated the authenticity of the Bin Laden tapes with two references. The CIA and Al Jazeera. I put the Al Jazeera article there to show that the second reference actually contradicts Fox's claim. The CIA has proven its intelligence analysis to be politically motivated. That brings us back to my point. There is no credible evidence linking Bin Laden or any Afghans to 9-11.
The audio tapes are less believable than the one video tape alleged to Bin Laden discussing Al Qaeda guilt. With your obsession with Islam, it amazes me that you know so little about its basic tenets. The man on the tape is not a fundamentalist Muslim by any means. The gold ring on his finger is proof of that, much like the FBI's reporting of several of the hijackers spending 9-10 in a strip club. Islam does not come with a "ask forgiveness right before you die" clause. The closest to that in the Koran is, "If you plan to change your ways in the 12th hour, expect to die in the 11th."

Hellpig said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hellpig said...

I know more about Islam than you ever will.Just the fact you believe Aljazzera is a reputable source of information illustrates my point about LIBERALISM.

Time for some re-education


Prophet of Doom
From the Right
Islam and the US


Sources from abroad see the UE deteriorate because of Islam

EU and Islam

read how the muslims demand editing school texts and state funded muslims schools and the removal of (impure meat in school lunches)

The UAE wants seat on the corrupt UN so they can impose their will on the world

Reverend X said...

Hellpig,
Yep, there fucked up over there. Thing is... that's over there. We have our own problems. I think we should prioritize things. Maybe take an "America First" approach for once. Didn't some guy once advise people to not worry about a spec in someone else's eye when you have a beam in your own?

Reverend X said...

Funny thing I almost forgot to mention. Bush is selling the security contracts to our largest ports to the UAE. If you don't trust them in the UN, why don't you care what they are trying to do here? Seems a little backwards.

My compliments on your technical improvements over the weekend. Seems my advice helped. Now do me a favor and tell me how you link URLs in comments here.

Hellpig said...

"Bush is selling the security contracts to our largest ports to the UAE. If you don't trust them in the UN, why don't you care what they are trying to do here? Seems a little backwards."

I am aware of the UAE and the ports BULLSHIT,This is one I will side with the DEMS (Sen.Clinton)is dealing with this one so I read somewhere.This is part of Islam's 20 yr. plan I linked you to

"Yep, there fucked up over there. Thing is... that's over there. We have our own problems. I think we should prioritize things. Maybe take an "America First" approach for once."

I used the EU as an example to show how LIBERALISM allows these people to integrate into society so they can manipulate the laws to serve their own Cult worshipping agenda by changing the culture of the host country.Which was clearly outlined in my last posts link Islam and the US

My point being that if we watch the EU closely we will be able to see the tell tale signs when they eventually start happening in the US

"Now do me a favor and tell me how you link URLs in comments here."

Give me your E-Mail address and I will tell you

Reverend X said...

Hellpig,

(Sen.Clinton)is dealing with this one so I read somewhere.This is part of Islam's 20 yr. plan I linked you to

She really does not lessen my apprehension in the slightest, globalist chickenhawk on security.
I view the 20 year plan theory the same as an illuminati theory. Pulling off an extended or multi-generational plan would require too high a level of dedication to an agenda. Think back 2 decades to the global powers and their allegiances. Would the present situation be believable to any of them? They would laugh you out of the room if you explained the world today. Change is constant and unpredictable.
I agree with you on watching the EU closely to make sure we do not make the same mistakes. As for any culture attempting to shape American culture: We adapt. We infect. That is the melting pot effect. As long as we adhere to a strict Freedom From Religion position, the Islamic culture can not become legislated. School will probably add an acceptable meal to their menus for Muslims, but it will be an additional choice. Do not spend tax dollars on any religious promotion or sanction any belief. The moment we do, we set precedents that could be used by any religion in the future.


Just put any word at blastedreality.net Catch all is operational.

Hellpig said...

I guess time will tell,I just found the comparisons with the EU's Muslim plight and the 20 yr. plan was right down to the letter.especially since the article was written almost 3 yrs. ago.It's just wierd to see these things unfold just as the author said they would, just over there and not here...YET!

As for the Ports BULLSHIT I still don't think it will fly with or without the"globalist chickenhawk"